CDCR Releases Statistics on the Pelican Bay SHU

Just now being revealed, the CDCR has released sobering numbers on prisoners in the Pelican Bay SHU.

Of the 1,111 people currently held in the SHU:

Over 513 have served 10 years or more in the SHU. Of those, 78 have been in the SHU for 20 years or more.

544 have been in the SHU more than 5 years, but fewer than 10 years.

32 thoughts on “CDCR Releases Statistics on the Pelican Bay SHU

  1. This is sad! When are we going to reform punishment from this barbaric system to a system that actually heals people that have broken man made laws.

  2. that is criminal. they are drunk with power and need to be checked. we’ve heard the cry of the strikers — if we turn our heads then shame on us. as politically conscious people, especially the fortunate ones like myself who put 32 years in the cages including a few on death row, we need to raise our voices and take it to the streets. friday we walk to attica from buffalo, peaceful but with a firm message that we remember and we’re not going anywhere until we see the changes we demand and our brothers and sisters inside need and deserve. attica means not giving up. peace and justice.

  3. this is entirely ridiculous. how can you expect a human, or any animal to live in a small, dark, enclosed space for several days, much less months, with out going completely bonkers! is it even legal to keep people in those type of living arrangements for that long?

    • Just search for it, Vikki. Keep informed. They are doing heinous things to human beings behind those walls, and behind the walls of all prisons. It’s an evil dominion of hell on earth….And they hope that we both do not find out what is going on and that they can talk us into paying more taxes to pay for what they are doing to these people.

  4. Yes Drunk with power is EXACTLY what is going on… and abuse of state revenues. a complete reform and attitude change is LONG over due…
    that is why they are striking again September 26, 2011.

  5. Anyone else heard about another strike in late September? I am in Oakland, I very much want to help you do this work. Let me know how.

    • Yeah. Their SECOND strike begins Monday, September 26, 2011. You can help bare minimum by blogging and making people aware of the crimes against humanity, perpetrated by the criminal “justice” department. You can help by loving your neighbor as much as yourself. You can help by being an advocate for ALL VICTIMS, including the children of the victim/slave/”offenders”. Vote NO on tax increases, and vote AGAINST those “TOUGH on Crime,” vs. “SMART ON CRIME.”

  6. Tortured SHU Prisoners Speak Out– The Struggle Continues

    [September 2011]

    For the past 10-40 years thousands of California prisoners have been confined in CDC-SHU units indefinitely based on status [r.g., a gang label – active gang classification, based on innocuous association activity, and allegations from confidential inmate informants] – wherein, they have been demonized as the worst-of-the-worst, in order to justify decades of human rights violations – including state sanctioned torture for the purpose of breaking the prisoners, and coercing them into becoming known informants for the state –thereby placing such prisoners, and their families in serious danger of retribution; as well as, the severe-permanent physical and psychological pain and suffering to these long term SHU prisoners and their families – directly related to CDCR-SHU policies and practices, all of which violate U.S. Constitutional, and international legal principles [as summarized in the prior formal complaint and 5-core demands available online].

    As of September 2011, these SHU-prisoners continue to be subjected to CDCR’s torturous human rights violations, in spite of the July 2011 peaceful protest via hunger strike, wherein thousands of prisoners of all races/groups united in their effort to bring mainstream exposure and force an end to such barbarous policies and practices. [CDCR has responded with more propaganda, lies, and vague double talk promises of change — in time].

    SHU prisoners are dissatisfied with CDCR’s response to their formal complaint and (5) core demands, and therefore will continue to resist via peaceful protest indefinitely, until actual changes are implemented as summarized below.

    1. The Formal Complaint and Five (5) Core Demands

    Beginning Feb. 5, 2010, dozens of PBSP-SHU prisoners and their family members and friends began sending copies of the formal complaint to numerous law makers, CDCR Secretary Cate, and to many organizations. CDCR’s response was, “file and inmate appeal.” In May 2011, the formal complaint, Notice of the Hunger Strike for July 01, 2011, and Five (5) Core Demands, were served on CDCR Sec. Cate, and Warden Lewis. There was no response …[notably, these documents were all posted on-line in March 2011].

    2. The July 1st Hunger Strike and CDCR’s Response(s)

    The H.S. began on July 1st at PBSP-SHU, and quickly spread to other prisons — at one point more than 6,600 prisoners participated at thirteen (13) prisons across the state!

    On July 14, 2011, CDCR Undersecretary Kernan spoke to the inmate representatives via phone conference, promising them that the (5) core demands would be addressed, with positive changes occurring over time. The reps asked Kerman to put details of the changes on paper for their review.

    On July 15, 2011, the reps reviewed the documents provided by Kernan and determined the documents were not satisfactory because they were very vague and did not specify any changes of substance in relation to the (5) core demands.

    On July 20th, Kernan and additional CDCR administrators met with the inmate reps in the PSB-SHU parole board hearing room. Kernan made more assurances about positive changes to SHU policies being in the works, and stated he would meet with the reps again in a couple of weeks in order to provide specifics as to each of the (5) core demands re: changes and progress made. As well as agreeing that, other than adding an extra day of visiting each week…the rest of the demands on (#5) re: programs/privileges, were reasonable and would be granted, as a show of good-faith on CDCR’s part.

    All of the [hunger strike] rep[presentative]s (14) then met and discussed the proposals from Kernan, and then decided to temporarily suspend the H.S., in order to give CDCR “a couple of weeks” grace period to keep their word on the (5) core demands [per Kernan’s request and assurances].

    On August 19th, Kernan and other CDCR Administrators, met with the reps again, to follow up on the July 20th assurances re: specifically addressing the (5) core demands in detail.

    Kernan did not have anything on paper to specifically address any of the (5) core demands. The meeting consisted of Kernan’s words – in very vague, general terms, about CDCR staff working to come up with some type of step down program for inmates to get out of SHU, which does not require debriefing- informant status, and Warden Lewis stating (SHU) inmates would soon be allowed to purchase sweat suits, and have the use of a handball on the yard.

    The reps pointed out that Kernan’s verbal, vague presentation was not what was agreed to on July 20th. Kernan responded that “a step down program will be operational by the end of this year, or early next year.”

    The reps asked for specific details to be provided on paper to all SHU sections so all inmates can have something tangible in their hands, and Kernan eventually agreed to begin providing this documentation within (2) weeks. Instead, on Sept. 02, a memo dated Aug. 25th, entitled Gang Mgt. Proposal was only issued to the (4) principle reps; this document is again, extremely vague and general. It is not adequate nor acceptable!

    On Aug. 23rd, Kernan appeared before the Calif. Assembly Public Safety Comm., to answer questions re: SHU policies and practices, that were exposed to the world via the H.S. According to the transcript of this Aug. 23rd hearing, Kernan was very vague, general, non-responsive, and focused on propagating CDCR’s out right lies about PBSP SHU policies, and the inmates subject to the torture therein – examples are;

    a. “The courts have found PBSP-SHU policies meet constitutional standards.” [This is false- see e.g., Madrid v. Gomez 889 F. Sup. 1146, at 1270, fn 217; see also, Griffin v. Gomez; Lira v. Cate, [cases cited in formal complaint!]. And, Chambers v. Florida, 309, U.S. 227, at 237-328 [1940].
    b. “SHU houses (3,000) prison gang generals, who spend 24/7 engaging in gang-activity which threatens prison and public safety; and, we need to isolate them in harsh conditions, to prevent them from ordering other inmates to kill staff on sight,” etc, etc, etc. [This is also false, There are no rule violation reports/or criminal charges to support this claim!]
    c. When asked directly by the Assembly if “debriefing places the inmate and his family in danger?” Kernan failed to respond! Notably Kernan stated that one certainty is CDCR’s plan to expand the number of prisoners subject to solitary confinement torture, by applying the policies and practices currently reserved for some suspected gang affiliates, to encompass all inmates categorized as party to any type of “disruptive group”[1] [e.g., the tens of thousands of street gang affiliates in CDCR prisons]; as well as, CDCR’s intent to continue to rely on information from “debriefing” inmates, to keep other inmates in SHU indefinitely!!

    On Aug. 31st, PBSP-SHU staff issued (4) memos, addressing the allowance of the following; handballs on the yard; ability to purchase sweat suits; and, with (1) year free of disciplinary action and committee approval, the ability to get a yearly photo taken and purchase art pens and drawing paper from the prison canteen. [While said memos were being passed out, a Sgt. was loudly telling staff to start writing up all prisoners for any type of reason they can think of, in order to prevent prisoners from getting their newly won privileges!]

    3. SHU Prisoner’s Dissatisfaction with CDCR’s Response to the Formal Complaint and Five (5) Core Demands;

    PBSP-SHU inmates have considered all facts and circumstances, summarized above, and remain united in our dissatisfaction with CDCR’s lack of specific substantive action on our (5) core demands. Our dissatisfactions are summarized below;

    A. Re: Core Demands #1-3

    Our problem with CDCR’s response to core demands #1, 2, and 3 is this…

    #1. We remain in (SHU) indefinitely, deprived of our basic human rights – based on illegal policies and practices, that amount to torture; torture of us, as well as our family members and loved ones on the outside. CDCR remains in denial, and continues to propagate the lies re: “worst-of-the-worst” 3000 gang generals, etc. – in order to dehumanize/demonize us, so as to maintain the status quo, and “continue to hammer us” [per Sec. Cate’s press statement earlier this year], and subject us to “harsh” conditions [per Kernan’s Aug. 23rd testimony]. These terms “hammer” and “harsh” conditions, are used in place of the word torture – and the fact is, CDCR’s intent is to break us down, and coerce us into becoming state informants! A violation of international treaty law-period!! This is not acceptable!

    CDCR has failed to produce any documentation re: details of how their so called “step-down” program will work, who it will apply to, exceptions-exclusions etc.; and our problem is,…”step down” from what?” When someone has been in (SHU) deprived of normal human contact- especially the lack of any physical contact with family/loved ones, for 10-40 years [based on a “label” without being charged and found guilty of illegal gang activity]; yet CDCR is dragging it out, coming with nothing but words, and vague “proposals,”…which indicate we will have to remain in (SHU), jumping thru a bunch of CDCR’s security hoops, to advance through “steps”…in spite of (3 to 25+) years free of any serious rule violations!

    Plus, we’re certain that CDCR Administrators have no intention of ever giving most of us in PBSP short corridor, any real chance for general population!

    #2. CDCR has made clear that one certainty is, their plan to substantially expand on the use of “solitary confinement”, via targeting all prisoners deemed “disruptive groups” [security threat groups], which is defined as: “2 or more inmates who are collectively deemed to be a security threat” – e.g., all street gang affiliates, prisoners deemed political-revolutionary etc, etc, etc. [see also; CCR Title 15; sec. 3000 “Disruptive Behavior”] even participating in a peaceful hunger strike. With CDCR’s history of abuse of policies re: “prison gangs” in solitary confinement, it’s clear, things will get worse, not better. This new policy is a way CDCR plans to maintain their staff and funding status quo, in response to the Plata order to reduce prison population. It costs nearly double to house prisoners in solitary confinement!

    Our position is, CDCR’s “plans” to date, are not acceptable, and are another example of their intent to maintain, and expand on, “solitary confinement;” and demonstrates a failure of the entire CDCR management to make positive reforms! And, all long term (SHU) inmates should be released to general populations!! ASAP!!

    #3. Also, the medical care problems re: core demand #3, have not been resolved!! All PBSP-SHU inmates suffering from chronic disease, and denied adequate care at PBSP, due to deliberate indifference, and efforts to coerce them to debrief … should all be transferred to New Folsom Medical SHU, while waiting to be released to general population!!

    B. Re: Core Demand #4

    This issue concerns our poor diet, small portions – all watered down, dirty trays, etc… and has not been fixed- in fact, its gotten worse since we came off the hunger strike on July 20th!! This lack of adequate nutritional food/vitamins causes all of us to lack energy and harms our mental/physical health – which greatly increases medical care costs! Plus, our lack of sunlight, and related lack of vitamin D, is a problem too. We need better food and portions, clean trays, and ability to purchase healthy food items and nutritional supplements ASAP!!

    C. Re: Core Demand #5

    There remains a problem with many of our program/privilege examples listed on demand #5, not being implemented [e.g., phone calls, canteen and package issues; T.V./Radio – channels; extra visiting time. What about the ability to get photos in visiting room, wherein c/o takes picture of inmate and visitors thru the glass?]. And, the ones that have been implemented in PBSP-SHU, have been done in a way that it makes it real hard for most inmates to get a photo, or art pens/drawing paper, because the warden has stated via memos, that inmates have to have (1) year free of disciplinary writeups, and they must first “have to be approved by committee.” [Kernan’s Aug. 29th memo to all SHU Wardens does not say inmates “need to go to committee” for these!]

    And, having to get sweat suits in yearly packages, equals another 40-50 ounces of weight, which means less food items! This weight for non-food items takes a lot out of food amount; then, you add all the packaging [e.g. box, etc.], and we will end up with very little food items in our packages [e.g. packaging (50-ounces), tennis shoes (50-ounces), sweat pants, shirt, shorts (40 ounces), thermals (18-20 ounces), equals 158 ounces of a max weight of 480 ounces!] An easy fix for these non-food items, is that PBSP can return to their old policy of allowing us to purchase all “non-food” items, thru special purchases, just like we continue to be allowed to do when ordering books and periodicals… {Note: The old policy was that we were allowed to order non-food items from an approved vendor once a year through Special Purchase.]

    In closing, to all SHU-prisoners and all our outside supporters,[2] we wanted to let you know, [as you can see from this], that this fight is far from over. And once again, hopefully for the last time, we will be risking our health lives via a peaceful hunger strike, starting on Sept 26, 2011 to force positive changes. None of us want to go on another hunger strike, but we are forced to by CDCR’s actions and non-actions as described herein. Thus, more than ever, we still need your support to contact the governor, etc, to force CDCR to make fair and reasonable changes to their policies, and indicated here. Thank you all very much!

    Respectfully and in Solidarity,

    From all PBSP SHU H.S. Reps.

  7. Pingback: The Truth About Solitary Confinement in California « Solitary Watch

  8. When I first watched “Murder in the first”I was horrified,but I thought that those atrocities couldn’t be perpatreted in our”more civilized”time.Now,with a 27 year old son who has spent most of the last 10 years in the hole I know that Alcatraz might be close,but torture is alive and well in California.

  9. HI MY NAME IS JESSICA SERRANO FROM LODI CA
    AND I WANNA TELL MY HONEY DANIEL MANRIQUEZ K78581 FROM PELICAN BAY SHU THAT IS IN THIS STRIKE THAT IM VERY PROUD OF HIM. TO STAY STRONG! AND WE…. THE INMATES LOVED ONES AND FAMILIES ALL STAND BEHIND THEM. THEY AINT ALONE. VERY PROUD WE ARE OF ALL OF THEM IN THE STRIKE …. GOD BLESS THEM!!! I LOVE YOU DANIEL.

  10. Pingback: werewolf » Left Coasting : Hunger for Justice

  11. Pingback: Pelican Bay Prisoners File Lawsuit Against Long-Term Isolation « Solitary Watch

  12. Pingback: California Assembly Reviews Solitary Confinement Policies As Prisoners Threaten New Hunger Strike

  13. Pingback: California Assembly Reviews Solitary Confinement Policies As Prisoners Threaten New Hunger Strike | Moorbey'z Blog

  14. Pingback: California Assembly Reviews Solitary Confinement Policies As Prisoners Threaten New Hunger Strike | A Solitary Torture

  15. Pingback: California Assembly Reviews Solitary Confinement | www.HumansinShadow.wordpress.com

  16. Pingback: California Assembly reviews solitary confinement policies as prisoners threaten new hunger strike | San Francisco Bay View

  17. Pingback: California Assembly reviews solitary confinement policies as prisoners threaten new hunger strike | Dogma and Geopolitics

  18. Pingback: California Assembly reviews solitary confinement policies as prisoners threaten new hunger strike | www.HumansinShadow.wordpress.com

  19. Pingback: Judge Rules California Solitary Confinement Lawsuit Should Have Its Day in Court

  20. Pingback: Solitary Watch News | www.HumansinShadow.wordpress.com

  21. Pingback: California Prisoners Launch New Hunger Strike to Protest Solitary Confinement | A Solitary Torture

  22. Pingback: California Prisoners Launch New Hunger Strike to Protest Solitary Confinement | PopularResistance.Org

  23. Pingback: California prisoners launch new hunger strike to protest solitary confinement | Happily Natural

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s