Hunger strike representatives at Pelican Bay State Prison’s Security Housing Unit (SHU), known as the Short Corridor Collective, have written and released a document rejecting the CDCR’s proposed plan for new regulations concerning SHU placement and gang validation, and presenting a counter-proposal. Read the Short Corridor Collective’s rejection here and read their counter-proposal here.
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity 
i’m proud of the inmates counter proposal. The breadth of research is vast, true and articulated well. How about while they are in the process to general population, if they are ever given the chance, they get a flood of self help opportunities to keep them busy and focused on positive change for when they do get housed in general population?
The part the inmates articulated about the flimsy evidence used by gang coordinators, example- a name showing up on anything and anywhere, combined with the unreliable nature of the debriefing process should be a cause of concern for anyone who cares about justice! I turned my life around from prison by writing novels and other prisoners can make the change given half a chance.
Pingback: Thursday (4/26): Urgent Mobilization to Sacramento! | Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity
Pingback: Urgent Mobilization: SHU Hunger Strike Support Rally on Thursday in Sacramento | Occupy Sacramento
Pingback: Urgent Mobilization: SHU Hunger Strike Support Rally on Thursday in Sacramento | Occupy the World
Pingback: The CA Hunger Strike: One Year Later | Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity
Pingback: Reflecting on the CA Hunger Strike & the Struggle Forward: An Interview With Antonio Guillen, Pelican Bay SHU prisoner & hunger strike representative | Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity
Pingback: Prisoners reject CDCR proposal; threaten new hunger strike | Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity
Pingback: Prisoners reject CDCR proposal; threaten new hunger strike « Moorbey'z Blog