Day 45 – Statement from the Mediation Team

The Department of Corrections is preparing to force-feed prisoners who have filed do-not-resuscitate orders, on the grounds that gang leaders may have coerced some of them into hunger-striking and even into signing do-not-resuscitate orders. However, thirty thousand prisoners embarked on the hunger strike initially, and only 69 of them were still on it last I heard—not very effective coercion. I’ve heard from men at multiple prisons who say that they personally, and others, did not sign do-not-resuscitate directives. So whatever drives the men to starve themselves and even martyr themselves is more powerful than the so-called gang coercion.

What is this powerful force? It is the dignity of mistreated people asserting itself. It is the indignation of the abused. It is the clamor of prisoners for their human rights.

Here is how prisoners themselves have said it in just the last week. J. at Corcoran wrote that a disciplinary write-up he received states “we were doing this on orders of the [gang] members housed at Pelican Bay State Prison (PBSP). [But] in fact we are participating in this peaceful protest cause we want to be treated like human beings and want our living environment to be as such. We are not animals.”

J. at California Medical Facility, who vows to hunger strike until the demands are met, wrote, “I too can relate to CDCR torture tactics as I’ve spent quite a bit of time in segregation at PBSP and other CDCR prisons. I’ve been locked in cages like an animal even when I’ve done nothing wrong. I’ve enclosed a picture of the type of cages prison staff have repeatedly placed me in for hours at a time.” (These cages are about the size of a phone booth.) He continues, “Officers passed me by in these cages and laughed or made rude, sarcastic and disrespectful comments to me…. No person(s) are asking me or pressuring me to join in hunger strike. This is by my own free will.”

M. at Corcoran told an interviewer that the crux of the motivation to protest was the inhumane amounts of time that prisoners are held in isolation [in the Security Housing Units (SHUs)]. We are suffering, he said, but let this be the last time we have to suffer. Even if we have to suffer for two or three more months, it will be worth it to win our demands.

The interviewer also spoke with A. at Corcoran, who said that the hunger strikers seek simply “decency and respect.” Though he knows he will spend his life in prison, “everything changed” for him when he learned that his son was imprisoned too. The change he desired took on a whole new level of importance. He pointed out that people on the outside have loved ones, friends and family members, who are inside, so what happens in prisons affects everyone.

C. at New Folsom wrote (in Spanish; this is my translation): “..we are just human beings who made errors and are paying with our liberty for our bad decisions. We are not animals! Yes, we have a heart that beats and bleeds at indifference, like anyone else. We are men who at times cry from the pain of loneliness but we refuse to accept it. We are men with feelings and the desire to help our children and youth so that they don’t repeat our histories—but we are not given the opportunity!”

The demands are decent food and healthcare, access to sunlight, an end to group punishment, not putting or keeping people in isolation based on secret allegations or who they associate with, use of isolation only as a last resort, and an end to indefinite isolation. International law makes the same demands, but California defies it.

California corrections officials, apparently, prefer to further torture the protesting prisoners through the excruciating procedure of force-feeding than to meet these reasonable demands.

On behalf of the Mediation Team,
Marilyn McMahon, California Prison Focus, (510) 836-7222

Hunger Strike Mediation Team
Dr. Ronald Ahnen, California Prison Focus and St. Mary’s College of California
Barbara Becnel,
Dolores Canales, California Families to Abolish Solitary Confinement
Irene Huerta, California Families to Abolish Solitary Confinement
Laura Magnani, American Friends Service Committee
Marilyn McMahon, California Prison Focus
Carol Strickman, Legal Services for Prisoners With Children
Azadeh Zohrabi, Legal Services for Prisoners With Children

3 thoughts on “Day 45 – Statement from the Mediation Team

  1. The CDCR could not have acted without the ruling of Judge Thelton Henderson. His previous rulings were clearly in favor of justice for prisoners. Write to tell him that in this instance his ruling was misguided and that hunger-striking prisoners should have been interviewed before the ruling was made. Here is his contact information: Judge Thelton E. Henderson, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Ave., Courtroom 12, Fl. 19, San Franncisco, CA 94102

  2. I am appalled to hear of the prison officials & other state officials ruling to force feed someone who coherently & of sound mind has refused to feul his body. I do not agree with the power and control issues faced by humans involved. Officials and or inmates. They are not rebelling or not defiantly acting out in violence or criminal behavior. They simply want to be heard and I feel it is their right to a trial by jury to determine if their case is valid. If state officials are so addimate and in fact correct, they should fear nothing by giving the inmates such an opportunity to do so. I am aware that the inmates that are in the shu are extremely dangerous and cannot be put into general public. But they aren’t asking to be placed there either. Their asking for humane living spaces for their own level. It’s been proven time and time again that officials within the prison do not follow the code of conduct and do house & treat them as if they were animals. Corcoran is one off the top of my head. The guards were releasing documents rival gang members to utilize their exercise time in the same area and then betting and watching them attempt to kill each other. It’s deserving of the consideration for compromise and of looking into and allowing them to present their case in a courtroom within a group of law obiding citizens whom take upmost pride and integrity in withholding the laws of man. And while their at it, the inmates should have psychotherapists begin to treat and document the direct effects of their living conditions and what impact it has on their recovery process. Corrections is another word for rehabilitation, isn’t it. I know people who have been incarcerated within the shu program. It never did anything as far as punishment, education or redirection of moral code. It didn’t instill any value or even allow room for emotional growth, stimulation, or recovery process. In fact it allowed more hatred and hatred towards those who were running the area. It did not benefit themselves, the relationship between guards and other inmates a d it didn’t prevent or protect another person by doing so. So what is the method behind it and why can’t they be heard if its ethical.
    One more issue before I close is the only process to exit the program clearly is unconstitutional. Yes we are dealing with criminals but by forcing these inmates to put their own lives in jeapordy by giving information about other people is wrong. Yes it is crime we are discussing, however to knowingly allow someone to put their life in danger to be removed from that program seems criminal in itself.. I would never expect someone to not care for themself to the point of possible murder, for the mere opportunity of being placed in livable conditions. It’s sort of like saying you can walk to the edge of death but you have to eat first. They can risk their life but damit we will for e feed you to death regardless so die and who cares. Something needs to be done. It’s Lmost to the point of genicide

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s