Short Corridor Collective Announces Agreement to End Hostilities

Representatives of the CA Hunger Strike issued a statement calling for an end to all violence and hostility between different groups of prisoners throughout the state of CA from maximum security prisons to county jails. The statement asks prisoners to unite beginning October 10th, 2012.

In their statement sent to Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity, the representatives explain:

We can no longer allow CDCR to use us against each
other for their benefit!! Because the reality is that collectively, we are an empowered, mighty force, that can positively change this entire corrupt system into a system that actually benefits prisoners, and thereby, the public as a whole… and we simply cannot allow CDCR/CCPOA – Prison Guard’s Union, IGI, ISU, OCS, and SSU, to continue to get away with their constant form of progressive oppression and warehousing of tens of thousands of prisoners, including the 14,000 (+) plus prisoners held in solitary confinement torture chambers [i.e. SHU/Ad-Seg Units] for decades!!!

Read the entire announcement from the Short Corridor Collective here.

11 thoughts on “Short Corridor Collective Announces Agreement to End Hostilities

  1. Reblogged this on Raven's Witch and commented:
    i have much respect for my ‘W.’ who has sat in the P.B.S.P. SHU for damned near 30 yrs. i hope this new tactic will finally disband the ‘gang’ known as the california dept. of corrections!

  2. I don’t know what percentage of prisoner’s families have email access so that this message can get to them and, in turn, to other prisoners. There can’t be a concerted action without communication. Please let me know, if you yourselves know, what this particular situation is for all the prisoners in California whom you hope to reach, if not by email, then by some method. Are all (or a high percentage of) names and locations even known? Sincerely, Stephen Kurtz

    On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity wrote:

    > ** > prisonerhungerstrikesolidarity posted: “Representatives of the CA > Hunger Strike issued a statement calling for an end to all violence and > hostility between different groups of prisoners throughout the state of CA > from maximum security prisons to county jails. The truce is set to begin > October 1”

  3. [[[[[ We are distributing these articles to all Washington media, to every Washington Legislator and to churches and human rights groups to help stimulate conversation and action toward bringing our state’s Department of Corrections into the 21st century. ]]]]]

    [ All of the following articles on the relationship between neighborhood violence and prison violence can be read at the website ]


    W H A T * H A P P E N S * I N * P R I S O N * D O E S N ‘ T * S T A Y * I N * P R I S O N

    “A study…compared illegal activity in the yard before and after the honors program was established. It showed that weapons infractions decreased 88%, violence and threatening behavior dropped 85% and drug-related offences and trafficking were down 43%.” -L.A. Times

    This website aims to raise public awareness of the pervasive risk of harm that Washington’s Department of Corrections’ violent prison culture poses toward staff and prisoners alike. Both, despite their differences, share a basic goal: not just survival, but the creation of a safe and secure environment for ALL concerned.

    All who are associated with this website, whether those whose stories appear hereon, or those who one way or another support the above mentioned objective, simply want the Washington Department of Corrections (WDOC) to move swiftly to create a “Sensitive Needs Yard” (SNY), so that prisoners who want and choose to can safely get out of the snakepit of violence, drugs and criminality that currently defines the dangerous state of things within WDOC.

    Without minimizing the need to secure a safer environment for staff who have to work the “line,” or the rights of prisoners who have to live the “line,” we also emphasize our agreement with former WDOC Secretary, Mr. Eldon Vail, who, in the aftermath of the tragic murder of WDOC corrections officer Ms. Jayne Biendl, stated ( paraphrased): SAFE COMMUNITIES BEGIN WITH SAFE AND SECURE PRISONS.

    The logic in this statement is undeniable. But the problem lies in the disconnect between theory and practice. Safer communities do indeed depend on safer prisons, but safer prisons depend on THE POLITICAL WILL TO MAKE THEM SO.

    WDOC is an archipelago of prisons that are, to quote the United States Supreme Court:

    “…places of involuntary confinement of persons who have a demonstrated proclivity for anti-social criminal, and often violent, conduct. Inmates have necessarily shown a lapse in ability to control and conform their behavior to the legitimate standards of society by the normal impulses of self-restraint; they have shown an inability to regulate their conduct in a way that reflects either a respect for law or an appreciation of the rights of others.”

    Nevertheless, prison administrators and staff are constitutionally charged with the challenging responsibilities of keeping themselves safe while ensuring that prisoners receive adequate food, clothing, shelter and medical care, and that reasonable measures guaranteeing prisoners’ safety are in place, for the highest court in the United States has long made it clear:

    ” No iron curtain separates prison inmates from constitutional protections.”

    Why no “iron curtain”? “[W]hen the state takes a person into its custody and holds him there against his will,” says the US Supreme Court, “the Constitution imposes upon it a corresponding duty to assume some responsibility for his safety and general well being.” In support of this legal principle, the same Court explained its logic:

    “[H]aving stripped [prisoners] of virtually every means of self-protection and foreclosed their access to outside aid, the government and its officials are not free to let the state of nature take its course.”

    This gets us back to reality: There’s an entire ocean of space between Mr. Vail’s logical formula for safe communities, and the day-to-day realities behind WDOC’s closed doors. The state of nature has taken its course in WDOC’s prisons, and because this is so, neither staff, prisoners nor our communities are safe.

    [[[ We are looking forward to reading the two final sections of this article, which will be appearing here soon. They will compare and contrast the criminal codes of the two main gangs in Washington’s prison system: the code of prison gangs, and the code of a gang of corrupted Department of Corrections employees.]]]

    ########## Safer neighborhoods begin with safe and secure prisons. ##########


    “Long-term isolation can create or exacerbate serious mental health problems and assaultive or anti-social behaviors, result in negative outcomes for institutional safety, and increase the risk of
    recidivism after release….”

    Tuesday, June 19, 2012

    Contacts: Patricia Connelly
    (212) 376-3062

    Peggy McGarry
    (212) 376-3131

    Vera Director Michael Jacobson Submits Testimony
    on Reassessing Solitary Confinement to the
    U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary
    Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights

    NEW YORK, NY―The first-ever Congressional hearing on solitary confinement is being held today by the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights. Solitary confinement—also known as segregation—long used to manage difficult prison populations, has come under closer scrutiny by policy makers in recent years, as more jurisdictions are looking for alternatives to this exceptionally expensive and increasingly harsh form of incarceration. The Vera Institute of Justice (Vera) is currently working with Illinois, Washington State, and Maryland to develop such safe alternatives.

    As Vera Director Michael Jacobson told the Subcommittee in written testimony, the use of solitary confinement by state and federal prisons has skyrocketed in recent decades. “Segregation was developed as a method for handling highly dangerous prisoners,Jacobson said. Increasingly, however, “it has been used with prisoners who do not pose a threat to staff or other prisoners but are placed in segregation for minor violations that are disruptive but not violent.”

    The reexamination of solitary confinement is driven, in part, by recent research suggesting that segregation is often counterproductive. “Long-term isolation can create or exacerbate serious mental health problems and assaultive or anti-social behaviors, result in negative outcomes for institutional safety, and increase the risk of recidivism after release,Jacobson told the Subcommittee. The current fiscal crisis is also prompting state prison systems to curtail expensive and ineffective practices, Jacobson said. “States can no longer afford these costs,he remarked.

    Pointing to one promising advance, Jacobson described the work of Vera’s Segregation Reduction Project (SRP). Launched in 2010, SRP is the first project of its kind to work with state prison systems to reduce safely the number of prisoners held in segregation and to improve the conditions of solitary confinement for those who remain. Currently, Vera is partnering with Illinois, Maryland, and Washington State and is in the process of extending SRP to a fourth state in the Southwest.

    Based on the lessons learned thus far through SRP, Jacobson offered a series of policy recommendations that jurisdictions could undertake now to curtail the public safety and financial costs of over-reliance on segregation, including:

    Safely using alternative disciplinary sanctions for all but serious rules violations;

    Reducing segregation time for certain categories of violations, when safety considerations permit;

    Reviewing the existing segregated population to better understand who is being placed into isolation and why;

    Providing segregated prisoners with incentives for sustained good behavior, to reduce segregation time;

    Separating special populations (for example, people in protective custody or with severe mental illness) into dedicated housing units where programming, procedures, and other conditions are tailored to their needs; and

    Increasing programming for prisoners in segregation to enhance their chances of successfully avoiding future disciplinary or justice system involvement.

    To help support such change, Jacobson recommended that Congress take steps to mandate and fund the following efforts:

    The collection of national data on segregation. A comprehensive census with precise definitions of types of segregation is vital to inform decision-making and legislation;
    A national study on the impact of segregation to assess the costs of the use of (different types of) segregation compared to housing in the general population, and costs associated with incarceration in prison overall; and the development of national standards on the use of segregation to encourage the field to adopt best practices.

    Michael Jacobson’s testimony is available on Vera’s website.

    ########## Safer neighborhoods begin with safe and secure prisons. ##########


    Burying people alive in solitary confinement costs up to THREE TIMES AS MUCH as housing them in Sensitive Needs Yard facilities!

    No wonder most departments of correction (including Washington’s) don’t want to talk about it. Conveniently, they don’t even keep track of that cost comparison! Here’s the response you will get from WDOC if you try to find out what this medieval practice is costing us:

    “I have been asked to respond to your email dated June 17, 2012. You had asked for the average cost per year of housing a prisoner in an intensive management unit and the average cost per year of housing a prisoner in general population. Although the Department recognizes there may be a higher cost to house an offender in an intensive management unit, we do not break out those costs separately.”

    Go to the excellent website below for the astounding lowdown on this colossal waste of taxpayer money. Here’s an excerpt from it:

    ” Reforms Lead to Savings

    “Spurred by litigation, legislation, leadership, and local activism, a handful of states have recently taken steps to reduce the number of prisoners they hold in solitary—a move that has clear fiscal benefits.

    “In recent years, Mississippi has reduced the number of
    prisoners it holds in solitary from 1,000 to about 150, and
    closed down its supermax unit. According to the ACLU, the
    reforms are saving Mississippi’s taxpayers an estimated $8
    million a year.”

    Click to access fact-sheet-the-high-cost-of-solitary-confinement.pdf

    ########## Safer neighborhoods begin with safe and secure prisons. ##########

    How SENSITIVE NEEDS YARDS or Honor Yards Save Taxpayers Millions Every Year

    Keeping sensitive needs prisoners in “protective custody” by throwing them into solitary confinement as WDOC does now, not only costs the prisoners dearly in terms of physical and mental health; it MORE THAN DOUBLES THE CUSTODY COSTS!

    Separating predator prisoners from their potential victims drastically lowers the number of assaults, medical expenses, lawsuits, etc. Besides being conducive to mental and physical health, education and rehabilitation, SENSITIVE NEEDS YARDS are by far the most inexpensive way of housing prisoners.

    WDOC’s present practice of forcing rehabilitating prisoners to live among violent prisoners simply gives the predators AN ENDLESS SUPPLY OF VICTIMS. (This also conveniently gives any potentially corrupt WDOC or union officials a perfect opportunity to expand their turf and continually threaten and plead for ever bigger and bigger budgets by pointing out the high violence rates to the legislature and the media!)


    Crowding at Prison Threatens Honor Program

    Dangerous criminals at the Lancaster facility are being housed with those who have pledged peace.

    By Richard Fausset
    LA Times Staff Writer

    An innovative program that seeks to reduce violence among maximum-security inmates is being severely tested at the state prison in Lancaster, where a population squeeze is forcing officials to house dangerous criminals with others who have vowed to remain peaceful.

    Since 2000, Lancaster’s honor yard program has created a special housing area for prisoners who have promised to stay away from gangs [of the violent variety], drugs and violence. Families, convicts and prison experts have praised the program for reducing violent incidents, and prison officials have considered taking the idea to other lockups around the state.

    But last month, about 130 inmates who did not meet the criteria were transferred to honor yard housing, prison spokesman Lt. Ken Lewis said Monday. Some of them are responsible for a stabbing March 16 and a violent melee Friday involving six prisoners.

    As a result of the fight, some honor inmates remained locked in their cells Monday while prison guards investigated the incident.

    Lewis acknowledged that the transfer ran the risk of diluting the honors program.

    “But our main goal is to house inmates, [and] we have to do what we have to do to house inmates. We’re overcrowded,” he said.

    The honors yard now houses 850 inmates.

    Lewis said that state corrections officials had told the prison to make more room for convicts with “sensitive needs,” [such as informants or other potential targets]. In the last few weeks, the number of these inmates has doubled to 2,000.

    That change displaced inmates who do not qualify for either the sensitive needs or honors program. Some were shipped to different prisons, but others remained at Lancaster, where the only beds available for them were in the honor yard, he said.

    Kenneth E. Hartman, an honors program inmate, wrote a letter to Youth and Adult Corrections Secretary Roderick Q. Hickman after the March stabbing incident, saying he feared it was “the start of a spate of violence.”

    Lt. Charles Hughes, president of the local chapter of the California Correctional Peace Officers Assn., said that staff members also worried about the changes. But he hoped the prison could find a way to maintain peace in the yard, he said.

    “Cops want it, inmates want it and management wants it,” Hughes said. “I still think with some good managerial stuff we can make it work.”

    The recent melee was quelled when officers fired block guns and sprayed mace at the fighting inmates. Giving few details, Lewis said all of the honor yard’s black inmates and those classified as racial “others” by the Department of Corrections usually Asians or Pacific Islanders would remain locked in their cells for the time being, because the fight involved members of those two groups.

    A study released by Lancaster prison officials in 2003 compared illegal activity in the yard before and after the honors program was established. It showed that weapons infractions decreased 88%, violence and threatening behavior dropped 85% and drug-related offenses and trafficking were down 43%.

    ########## Safer communities begin with safe and secure prisons ##########

    What you can do to help make prisons and communities safer:


    We are asking law-makers, administrators,WDOC personnel, etc. to discuss the information on this site, and then consider advocating for a Sensitive Needs Yard policy for WDOC.


    We can supply you with contact information and can facilitate interviews, etc. with activist prisoners with whom we have worked for many years.


    Have your story emailed to us (anonymously if necessary). How have pressures exerted by extortionists/thugs, and the like affected your life and the lives of others? How would your prison life be different if you could choose to live separate from those who choose drugs, violence, criminality?


    Contact your legislators and the media asking them to explore the tremendous proven savings in taxpayer dollars and human misery that Sensitive Needs Yard policies have brought about in other states. (Also sometimes called “honor yard.”)


    Familiarize yourself with the stories and other information which will be appearing on this website and in other sources. Write your own story and email it to us for possible (anonymous if necessary) publication on this site. Contact Washington legislators and administrators, WDOC officials, and media with a link to this site (and preferably including your thoughts on this important public safety matter.)

    ########## Safer communities begin with safe and secure prisons. ##########


    S O L I T A R Y * STORY #1

    I have recently dropped out of the Sureno car [gang]. I am 35 years old. I have not gang-banged since I was 21. This is my first time down: 2010 – 2013. When I first got to prison I tried to stay out of the “politics.” But prison gives you no choice. I was put in the lower Rs in Shelton’s Washington Correctional Center, with nothing but Surenos. I had nowhere else to go but to join the influence of the gang. I try to stay out of trouble but found myself caught in a riot at Stafford Creek. I didn’t want trouble, it came to me and I had to defend myself. So when I lost good time and got closed out to Washington State Penitentiary I decided I am not going to let gang inluence keep taking good time away from me and my family (3 kids). So I checked into protective custody (IMU: Intensive Management Unit), only to find that there is nothing for me.

    IMU is the only safe place for me, and you can not go to church here, you can’t go and get an education, there are no jobs here, and you have to visit your family behind glass. While the gangsters are enjoying mainline pressuring people to do what they want, and if they don’t getting rid of them off into IMU!

    It is too bad that when someone wants to better their life by not commiting acts of violence or being in a gang, in the state of Washington there is no help for us! In two months I will go to another facility, where the Intelligence and Investigation (I&I) tell me it is safe for me. I know however I will be X-ed out. (or assaulted by the Surenos). In spite of that I would rather go than to stay here in IMU. I just hope I don’t lose any more good time.


    S O L I T A R Y * STORY # 2

    I came to Washington Department of Corrections (WDOC) in 2005 when I was 18 years old and was really trying to rehabilitate myself by turning to my Christian faith. However WDOC officials put me in a 4-man cell with three very violent known gang members who immediately started beating me up because I would not join their gang and their violent ways of. After being beat up numerous times and having correctional officers walk by our cell turning their head the other way when they knew I was being assaulted I had no choice but to join the prison gang and get involved, which deprived me of any opportunity of prison rehabilitation and continuing my Christian faith. Instead I was forced to do things against my will.

    This went on for three months and I told my classification counselor in 8-wing Washington State Penitentiary closed custody in February 2006 that I was being abused by my cellmates. But I was still made to return to my cell. For the next two weeks after that I was beaten every day severely until I couldn’t take it any longer and I asked for protective custody. At that time my classification counselor started repeatedly apologizing for allowing me to go back to my cell after I told him I was being abused. The counselor stated he told the CUS, but they thought I was just being picked on. But the bruises all over my body which they confirmed by taking photos said otherwise. The prison authorities were just trying to avoid a lawsuit for failure to protect. After that I was thrown in the hole for protective custody and 3 hours later a prison Intelligence and Investigations (I&I) person came and talked to me, After all that had happened to me he
    asked me if I would be willing to go back out to general population to gather information for him of the white supremacists. I told him I don’t think so because I was scared and beaten. But all he was interested in was getting me to tell him information. I was sent to another dangerous closed custody facility at the Washington State Reformatory at the Monroe Correctional Complex and once again put in harms way by being celled up with another white supremacist that was in the same gang as my former cellies at Washington State Penitentiary that I had just told on. On top of that this cellie “paper-checked” me. I told him I didn’t have any paper-work, He said if I didn’t get some he would cut my throat. To save my own life I had no choice but to assault another inmate in order to not have to return to the white supremacist’s cell.

    I was then placed in solitary confinement in an IMU (intensive management unit) at Shelton’s WCC (Washington Corrections Center), where I developed a mental illness from being isolated so long. I started hurting myself, so I then was transferred to a mental health facility and kept in solitary for three years because I kept trying to hurt myself and commit suicide. Instead of putting me in a safe mental health population to get me help, I was instead kept in solitary where I slowly deteriorated mentally, physically and spiritually and gave up hope. I was given minimum, inhuman living conditions.

    In February of 2010 I was transferred from Monroe Correctional Complex to a dangerous closed custody facility at Clallam Bay Corrections Center. At Monroe I had asked for protective custody because a white supremacist had made a shank and intended to kill me, so I was kept in solitary on protective custody for three months there. When I was transferred to Clallam Bay which was even more dangerous, it was only a matter of time before the white supremacists known as the AF (Aryan Family) and their allies Surenos Gangs found out I was transferred on protective custody. I was celled up with a Skin Head gang member who immediatly asked for my papers and I told him I didn’t have any, so he threatened me and grabberd me by the throat and said that if he found out I was no good I better not come back to the cell. So once again I assaulted a Correctional Officer to save my life by being in solitary and out of danger.

    Because Washington Department of Corrections doesn’t have a “sensitive needs yard” or honor yard, I was forced to live in extreme danger. I was given twelve months in solitary (IMU) and an extra year in prison. But it was a small price to pay to save my life from the gangs that I was forced to live with in population. After being in IMU I again started to suffer from insufficient mental health care and sensory deprivation. Now here I am being in IMU for 29 months. I am anti-social and have 72 suicide attempts, self-mutilations. I’ve banged my head open and cut my wrists. This is what being in IMU does to mentally ill people. I have lived it and seen it but I’m not ready so give up. I have been at Walla Walla State Penitentiary for one year now and mental health care is insufficient and poor and does not care about inmates that are suffering in these IMUs like myself. Instead they throw me in a cell buck naked with an unsanitary drain in the
    floor with bars and in order for me to use the drain I have to sit on the cold steel drain on the floor and then the officers will tell me now use your hands and shove your feces down the drain.This is inhumane. There is no water and soap or a sink for that matter, so I can’t clean the feces off my hands.

    These seclusion rooms are used to psychologically break an inmate down, basically the motive is cruel and unusual. Punishment to stop an inmate as myself from asking for help. After hurting myself one day a mental health staff member forced me to walk around naked. His name was Blackham and he let me bang my head for 5 hours and then I had to sleep on the floor naked, freezing cold, then the next day I was sent back to solitary IMU.

    If Washington Department of Corrections would have had a sensitive needs yard for me to go to I would have been safe, a model inmate and would have been rehabilitating myself every day. Instead they don’t care about the money a sensitive needs yard would save taxpayers, because in the end some corrupt prison officials would be losing money because there would be less violence and therefore less money granted to the budget. The system is not about rehabilitation or public safety, it is about a few corrupt Department of Corrections officials’ greed.

    I hope this story will help people realize the pain and suffering of those who really want to get rehabilitated, but instead end up suffering.


    [from Solitary Watch:]


    by Solitary Watch Guest Author
    Guest Post by Terry A. Kupers, M.D., M.S.P.
    Editors’ note: Dr. Terry Kupers is one of the world’s leading experts on the psychological effects of solitary confinement. A psychiatrist with a background in psychoanalytic psychotherapy, forensics, and social and community psychiatry, he teaches at the Wright Institute, a graduate school of psychology in Berkeley, California, while also maintaining a private practice and serving as a consultant to mental health centers and social rehabilitation programs in the community.

    Dr. Kupers has studied and worked with prisoners in solitary confinement, and describes mentally ill inmates confined in segregated housing units as “the most severely psychotic people I have seen in more than 25 years of practice.” He has testified in several large class action litigations concerning jail and prison conditions, sexual abuse, and the quality of mental health services inside correctional facilities, and served as a consultant to Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and Stop Prisoner Rape. His books include Prison Madness: The Mental Health Crisis Behind Bars and What We Must Do About It.

    The piece below is an excerpt from a longer article that appeared in the book Humane Prisons, edited by David Jones (Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing, 2006). In the full article, available online here, Dr. Kupers describes in detail each of the ingredients in his “recipe for creating madness in our prisons”–which is in fact also a recipe for creating an explosion in long-term solitary confinement.

    It’s worth pausing for a moment to consider how we created as much madness as exists today in our prisons. Perhaps, after exploring how we arrived at this dreadful state of affairs, we can strive to reverse the process and foster sanity, at the same time developing humane and effective prisons. READ ON:


    I T ‘ S * T H E * L A W !


    RCW 72.09.010(5)(e) Sharing in the obligations of the community. All citizens, the public and inmates alike, have a personal and fiscal obligation in the corrections system. All communities must share in the responsibility of the corrections system.


    PLEASE CONTACT US if you would like more information or are interested in becoming a part of our efforts:



  5. Pingback: Homies Unidos » Blog Archive » California Prisoners Make Historic Call for Peace between Racial Groups in California Prisons & Jails

  6. Pingback: LA youth join call for end to hostilities | Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity

  7. Pingback: LA youth join call for end to hostilities « Frontlines of Revolutionary Struggle

  8. Pingback: Agreement to End Hostilities Starts TODAY!! | Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity

  9. Former hostage, Shane Bauer, writing for Nov/Dec. Mother Jones, stated, “Solitary in Iran nearly broke me. I never thought I’d see worse in American prisons.” Yes, America tortures!

  10. Pingback: Please Support Our Work this Year! | Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s