CDCR Proposed Changes to Conditions of Solitary Confinement March 2012: Response from California Families to Abolish Solitary Confinement

We live in a state whose citizens are more morally outraged about the confinement of chickens and dogs than of human beings. We are the loved ones of men and women who have been incarcerated indefinitely—some for decades—in California’s “supermax” segregated and administrative housing units.   Solitary confinement, even for short periods, has been known for centuries to cause irreparable physical and psychological damage: torture. Yet California continues to condone this practice in violation of both Constitutional and international law against the use of this and other inhuman and degrading treatment.

In March of 2012 the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) came out with its long-awaited proposal to overhaul its use of prolonged solitary confinement to manage gangs and violent prisoners.    Families, lawyers, prisoners and activists had hoped that after two peaceful hunger strikes in 2011 engaging 12,000 prisoners protesting CDCR’s illegal practices, the Department would follow several other states that have successfully and significantly reduced their use of solitary confinement and instituted effective rehabilitation and re-entry programs—and at great savings to overstressed state budgets.

Sadly, that was not the case. By definition “torture” is the intentional infliction of severe mental or physical pain or suffering by or with the consent of state authorities for a specific purpose.  With CDCR, this purpose is to extract information about gang activities, real or fabricated. There is nothing in these new proposals that leads any of us to believe that a sincere reform of CDCR’s extremist policies is at hand; in fact, the language is more obscure, the policies more layered, and the prisoners’ demands for decency and rehabilitation virtually ignored. Amnesty International and the National Religious Campaign Against Torture among others issued immediate statements repudiating this document as not going far enough to address the inhumane conditions that have persisted in California prisons for decades. If anything, much of the new document appears even more Draconian. We are very concerned for our loved ones inside this prison within the prison.

Prisons are by nature closed systems, yet they are funded by taxpayers and are public institutions whose function is to oversee the deprivation of liberty, an extreme use of power against an individual. Our loved ones are human beings first and prisoners second. Too many have endured retaliation, arbitrary interpretations of CDCR’s regulations code, poor food, medical negligence, and an inability to program out of solitary unless they self-incriminate, snitch, or die. This is not to ignore crime and punishment, but we believe the public interest in law and order can best be served through standards of morality and human decency.
All California communities are stakeholders in what happens in our prisons because many of these inmates will eventually return to society. Even if our state’s citizens may not generally be sympathetic to prisoners, we must hold our public institutions to high ethical standards, including assuring that both prisons and communities are safe.
California’s version of supermax is extreme on every level, involving more prisoners for more of their sentences under worse conditions. Many states are revisiting their use of solitary confinement, but given California’s documented tendency to create torturous conditions under the justification of security, large-scale use of solitary confinement in this state should end.

Substantial, meaningful and ethical revision of the CDCR proposals will be a large step toward addressing the barbaric and inhumane treatment to which SHU prisoners are currently subjected, with no threat to public safety. We believe Californians have a considerable stake in this humanitarian reform and we ask your participation in our efforts to raise awareness and end torture in California prisons.

California Families to Abolish Solitary Confinement – CFASC   8108 E Santa Ana Canyon Rd. #100, 213  Anaheim, CA92808                

Contact us at 714.290.9077

5 thoughts on “CDCR Proposed Changes to Conditions of Solitary Confinement March 2012: Response from California Families to Abolish Solitary Confinement

  1. I spent 10 years in California prisons for drug charges, some of that in solitary. I turned my life around writing novels and novellas. Underdog, is about the hunger stike and 5 core demands and I used an analogy to dogs in cages. I just did a radio interivew with KHSU NPR about it.

  2. Pingback: TimeWise Miracle Set – Good Housekeeping The Anti-Aging Properties of Resveratrol - Revitalizes skin for anti aging

  3. Reblogged this on Wobbly Warrior's Blog and commented:
    No citizen pays their state or federal taxes with the expectation that their dollars will be used to inflict acknowledged torturous conditions upon their loved ones. It is bizarre enough that we are forced to fund endless wars, it is beyond bizarre that we are forced to fund harming our own.

  4. Undeniably believe that that you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the internet the easiest factor to take note of. I say to you, I certainly get irked at the same time as other people consider worries that they just do not recognize about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top and outlined out the entire thing with no need side-effects , folks could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thank you

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s